
The first words of āThe Anarchistās Tool Chestā are ādisobey me,ā a paradoxical expression that underlies much of my favorite absurdist Russian literature. You can take the expression at face value, or you can think about it for a minute and consider that perhaps Gregor Samsa has not really turned into a cockroach.
When I finished writing āCampaign Furniture,ā I wanted to begin the book with Alfred Korzybskiās dictum, āThe map is not the territory.ā But I decided to just play it straight and not include any discussion of semantics. The book itself is a straightforward discussion of the furniture and how to build it. I donāt think this book will get me in trouble like my last one did. So I didnāt include the Korzybski quote.
That doesnāt stop me, however, from talking about my unspoken motives for the book here on the blog. While the book (the map) is about campaign furniture, the uncharted territory it describes is far different.
After 15 years at Popular Woodworking, I concluded that our craft is strapped into a stylistic straightjacket (Shaker and Arts & Crafts) that does more harm than good. Now before you get your panties in a bundle, let me be clear about a couple things: Thereās nothing wrong with either of those styles. I love them both. I also love Oreos, but an exclusive diet of them is a bad idea. Also, I was part of the problem. I wrote, approved and encouraged the publication of hundreds of pieces dealing with Shaker and Arts & Crafts.
So I also want to be part of the solution. āCampaign Furnitureā is part of that. āFurniture of Necessity,ā my next book, is the next step in that direction.
I want readers to explore other styles, even if it isnāt campaign style or vernacular furniture. There is a world of furniture styles out there that are begging to be built. And itās furniture that beginners can handle. Danish modern, Bauhaus, Japanese Tansu, Chinese furniture (a fricking world of Chinese furniture) are just a few of the styles out there that donāt require an 18th-century apprenticeship to build and are beautiful.
And Iām willing to take a personal hit to my income to try to open your eyes.

If I were smart, Iād write a book on birdhouses, which usually sell twice as many units as any traditional woodworking book. Or Iād do another book on workbenches, Shaker furniture or Arts & Crafts.
Writing a book on an obscure furniture style is economic stupidity. If people donāt like the style, they wonāt buy the book, no matter how good it is. Books on a furniture style (even Shaker) will always sell worse than books on skills, tools or workshops. Books on an obscure furniture style usually go from the printer right to the bargain bin. (Ever seen the fascinating book on Mormon furniture? Thatās exactly my point.)
Today I received my copy of āCampaign Furniture,ā and it doesnāt completely disappoint me. The printing job is nice. I like the end sheets. The binding looks good ā not too much glue and the stitching is solid. So Iām drinking a Stone āOld Guardianā right now to celebrate the release of what could be a monumentally unsuccessful book.
I also take a sip to hope ā that some of you are willing to step outside the narrow confines of our craft and start to explore the immense uncharted territory ahead of us.
āCampaign Furniture,ā for better or worse, has a map inside.
ā Christopher Schwarz
Like this:
Like Loading...