Barley, our temporary shop dog (he and his person are visiting this week).
Chris and I will be eagerly awaiting your woodworking questions this Saturday (April 19) from about 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
On Saturday morning, an “Open Wire” post will go live. If you have a question, all you have to do is type it into the comments and we’ll – eventually – answer (we fit in weekend computer time around bench time).
Readers with relevant info are also welcome to chime in. For example – we sometimes get asked things like, “Where near Flagstaff can I buy purpleheart?” We have no idea – so if you do, please do let the poor misguided* soul who wants to use purpleheart know where they can get it.
Get those questions ready. (And check out the “Open Wire” category in the meantime – there are lots of good questions and answers there already!)
The remaining Open Wire dates for 2025 are: April 19 June 14 August 9 October 25 December 13
– Fitz
*In all fairness, purpleheart is an excellent choice for a deck and will quickly turn gray/brown, thereby making it tolerable.
A simple ogee (aka cyma recta or cyma reversa) on the ends of a six-board chest.
Both Chris and I have made and taught a lot of six-board chests over the years, and typically we lay out and cut a “boot-jack,” (inverted V”), simple arc or ogee on the ends. Those are easy to lay out and all three are relatively easy to cut…and and don’t hurt our brains or the brains of students too much.
So when working on “Good Eye” the latest artisan geometry book from Jim Tolpin and George Walker, we were both rather dumbstruck with the clever way the authors reverse-engineered the layout of a fancy-looking but simple-to-cut six-board end panel – a layout I have never produced, but have now added to my mental design library. It’s not that I couldn’t have made this shape through measuring – it just wouldn’t have occurred to me to do so; I try to always teach a layout that is scalable without numbers and requires just a few tools, such as a straightedge and compass. That way, you’re teaching the process not the result.
That’s the approach of this entire book – looking at a piece of furniture and showing how the relationships between and among its proportions, and how you can use this knowledge in the real world as you design your own pieces. (Or how to better understand what makes an exiting piece “good.”)
I’ve excerpted this section of “Good Eye” for you below.
– Fitz
Next, let’s turn our attention to the end panels. In addition to the decorative pattern covering the entire surface, the end panels have a triangle cutout (Fig. 3.23). This is not just decorative; it gives the piece four feet to improve stability.
If you look closer, you’ll notice it’s not one, but two triangles, one nested inside the other. The smaller triangle provides that space to carve some relief at the bottom of the decoration. Notice also that this smaller triangle is notched with a right-angle cutout near the floor. It’s likely that the bulk of the decorative linenfold on both end panels was executed on a single board. It was then cut in half, one for each end. So we’ll lay out a mirror-image pattern on the backside of the board and then saw them out after the linenfold is complete.
Because we are making the end panels from a single board we begin with a board that’s two units wide. Instead of three units high, we double it to six units high to have enough length for both ends (Fig. 3.24).
It’s two mirror-image triangles with a pair of smaller triangles nested inside them (Fig. 3.25). The lines and circles that create this pattern look complicated at first glance (Fig. 3.26). Yet, if we walk through it step by step, you can see the logic unfold and the genius of this deceptively simple design.
Begin by drawing a pair of diagonals across the corners (Fig. 3.27). This provides our centerline for the decorative linenfold pattern as well as the apex for our large triangle cutout. It also marks the halfway spot to mark a saw line to separate the two pieces later on.
The first large decorative triangle is centered on the board. The bottom corner of the triangle is inset one-fourth the overall width of the board. We can find that one-fourth width with another pair of diagonals (Fig. 3.28).
Note that we used diagonals just like we did before when locating one-third of a rectangle. Again, these intersections locate one-fourth of our rectangle on both the vertical and the horizontal.
The larger decorative triangles are equilateral. To locate the apex, set a pair of dividers to span the width of the base of the triangle and scribe a pair of overlapping circles (Fig. 3.29).
These two circles define our two mirror-image triangles. A line that runs from the center of one circle to the other establishes the base of our triangles. The intersections, top and bottom, where our circles overlap, locate the apex of both triangles. Strike lines to connect the width of the base with the apex on both top and bottom. These two back-to-back triangles create a diamond shape.
To define the smaller triangles that are nested inside, draw a line from the corner of the board that passes through the apex of our triangle until it crosses the saw line (Fig. 3.30).
Draw three more diagonals, one from each corner to complete the two smaller triangles. Finally, the small notch at the base of the smaller triangle. It’s simply two side-by-side squares, or you could picture it as a rectangle that’s one unit high by two units wide (Fig. 3.31).
The layout for the decorative linenfold carving is similar to the front panel. The width of the tools themselves step off the repetitions across the board using the centerline as the starting point.
One final note on these geometric layouts. For the sake of clarity, we show all lines and circles in their entirety. When you see these layouts in historic books or even remnants left on old work, the actual layout lines are abbreviated. You might see only a few intersections and tick marks. If I were laying this out, being familiar with lines, it would look something like Fig. 3.32. It’s abbreviated, but still has the information needed.
When Nick, a woodworker and LAP reader, first let us know about Layout Computer, his free digital chair design tool, I thought, “Wow – that’s nifty and would be awfully useful…if only I made chairs.”
Well, now I think it’s unbearably cool and altogether useful, because Nick has added casework (as well as a dovetail joints, and he’s working on a drawer-design function right now).
Bookmark Nick’s site. The tool is a quick way to mock up various casework configurations – and a lot more quickly than I was ever able to do it in SketchUp – using a series of sliding tabs to change ratios, board thicknesses. (Watch the short video on the “Casework” page and you’ll quickly be up to speed on how to use the tool.)
You can play with combinations of bases, vertical divisions, depths, number of shelves so on, and you can toggle between metric and American customary units.
And when you’re satisfied, click the “layout” tab to get the dimensions for your design. Then you can generate a URL (under the “save” tab) to quickly get back to your masterpiece.
And did I mention it’s free? Nick developed Layout Computer make it easy for him to mock up his own work, but he generously shares his work with the world (though if you’re so inclined donations are welcomed – just click on the “About” tab on the home page).
– Fitz
p.s. The “Joint” tab is also a lot of fun to play with…and confirms my long-held belief that 1:6 is the best dovetail angle 🙂
“Artisan Geometry” is the overarching term used to describe the design approach in the five Lost Art Press books by Jim Tolpin and George Walker. We often get asked to explain it, and to recommend one or more of their books with which to get started.
We decided those questions would be better answered by Jim and George themselves – so they wrote a brief explanation of the term, then gave us some summations of each of the books. Check out the new Artisan Geometry page in our online store for their thoughts.
I recently learned my finishing mentor – likely he was yours, too – and friend Bob Flexner died at home on December 29, 2024 (read his obituary here). Bob was perhaps best-known for the book “Understanding Wood Finishing,” recognized by many as the bible of all things finishing, and as the long-time finishing columnist for Popular Woodworking Magazine.
That’s how I met him, when I was hired as managing editor for PWM in 2005. I was assigned his column to edit, and was warned that he was persnickety about every change; he was every bit as meticulous about his writing as he was with his finishing research and experimentation.
At first I was a little scared of Bob – but then I called to ask a few questions about his December 2005 column on spray gun maintenance, and we got into a somewhat spirited discussion about comma splices, misplaced modifiers and the like. After that, he trusted me to make minor grammatical and syntactical changes without his approval – but I usually sought his input and OK anyway, simply because I enjoyed talking with him.
When I was working on my first house, Bob was always delighted to wax prolific when answering my (probably) boneheaded questions about floor finishes, the best paint strippers, what kind of brush to use on this type of surface…. He’s why I know about blotching, bleeding and fish eye, and why I’m now pretty good at painting and brushing on shellac. And why I never trust a manufacturer’s application instructions (he’d want me to reiterate that neither should you).
After I left PWM in 2017, I’d email or call Bob every so often to check in and see how he was doing. Then in late 2020, I was hired to copy edit the third revised edition of “Understanding Wood Finishing” and the second edition of “Wood Finishing 101” (Fox Chapel). It was a joy to once again work with him.