Roorkee Chair

This is an excerpt from “Campaign Furniture” by Christopher Schwarz. 

As the British military was forced to become more responsive and quick at the end of the Victorian era, traditional and bulky items were traded for furniture that was lightweight and compact.

Someone in the late 19th century invented the Roorkee chair, a Spartan design that was destined to influence generations of modern furniture designers in the 20th century.

The Roorkee, named after an area in India, has no fixed joinery. The legs and stretchers are joined without glue; when the chair is assembled, the seat and strapping hold everything together. Likewise, the back of the chair is but two sticks that are covered in cloth and held to the chair’s frame with bolts.

As a result of this shockingly spare design, the chair weighs little – 8 to 10 lbs. is typical. It folds into a small package. And despite all these details, it is remarkably comfortable.

The Roorkee is designed for lounging, not for dining or work at a tall desk. As a result, it is low to the floor, like a Morris chair or any other camp chair. Most Roorkee chairs were covered in rot-proof canvas. Today, reproductions are made in both leather and canvas.

The leather adds weight and stiffness. The weight is undesirable if you are portaging the chair through the mountains. But the stiffness of the back and seat is a good thing for your comfort.

Roorkees with canvas backs can feel like sitting in a flour sack (I’ve made several using military-spec canvas). So while leather might not be 100-percent authentic, I do think it is the superior material for this chair. After experimenting with hides of several thicknesses, my favorite is an 8 oz. hide, which is a full 1/8″ thick.

If you research this form yourself, you’ll find several versions of “improved” Roorkee chairs. These might have an adjustable headrest or sticks that you are supposed to drape your legs over, like a planter’s chair. I have yet to build an improved Roorkee.

Roorkee chairs show up in a variety of species, from ash to mahogany to teak. The way the stretchers are inserted into the legs can vary. One common method is a tapered mortise-and-tenon joint. This Windsor-chair joint offers a lot of surface area for the joint without weakening the leg in the way a cylindrical mortise would. Plus, the more weight that is placed on the chair, the tighter the joint becomes.

Some Roorkees are joined with a simple cylindrical mortise-and-tenon joint. Still others have some sort of hybrid joinery – the tenon might be a cylinder but it will have a square shoulder that fits into a shallow square mortise at the top of the cylindrical mortise.

As you study the Roorkee chair, you’ll also find a variety of turnings used for the legs, everything from a simple taper to strong (but busy) coves and beads.

The classic Roorkee has a turned cylinder near the top of each leg that acts as a convenient handle for lifting an assembled chair. The foot of a Roorkee is typically a straight taper that ends in some sort of shaped foot. Some Roorkees don’t have a shaped foot and end in a thin taper.

The Influence of the Design
The Roorkee chair was designed for the military, but its utilitarian core appealed to modern designers. Kaare Klint, one of the founders of the Danish modern style, directly aped the Roorkee chair for his famous “Safari Chair,” which was popular through the 1970s.

The influence of the Roorkee was more far spread than Denmark. Marcel Breuer’s “Wassily” chair (1925), Le Corbusier’s “Basculant” chair (1928), Wilhelm Bofinger’s “Farmer Chair” (1966), Arne Norell’s “Sirocco” chair and Vico Magistretti’s “Armchair 905” (1964) all owe a tremendous debt to the Roorkee chair.

The influence of the Roorkee for decades after its introduction has always been an important indicator that campaign furniture as a whole might be an underappreciated style. Like the Roorkee, campaign furniture was designed to impress you more with its utility than its fashionableness. Its only real ornament consisted of things that made it stronger. It used woods that resisted the tropics, joinery that didn’t rely on glue and brass that held everything together.

In many ways, campaign pieces have more in common with workbenches and tool chests than with delicate dining tables, carved sideboards and veneered highboys. And that is why I think the campaign style is worth reviving among woodworkers.

Meghan Bates


This entry was posted in Campaign Furniture. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Roorkee Chair

  1. For a over 20 years of my early adult life I sat with regularity upon an unembellished Roorkee chair almost exactly similar to the one pictured above. I state with the confidence of some maturity and later years of attempted chair making and sitting on chairs, that the Roorkee chair is as uncomfortable as any chair I have ever sat on during my life and perhaps even more uncomfortable. The framed canvas back is soon an assault on the curved lumbar spine, the framed canvas seat soon burns the buttocks. True, the pictured chair has some pretence of padding delaying assault to the lumbar by a few minutes at best. The Roorkee chair does not provide padding anywhere. I do not comment about other related chairs mentioned since I have never sat on or in them. I do not begrudge the military the remarkable portability of the Roorkee chair, but I deeply regret and am embarrassed by my early adult association with them.Ouch!


  2. darnmcdo says:

    I am seriously considering building one of these chairs following the plans in the book and video. I have hesitated somewhat wondering just how comfortable the chair would be.
    Love to hear comments on comfort from anyone who has built one of these.


    • colsdave says:

      The examples shown above have “flat” seats fore-and-aft which tend to sit the user forward with the sitters knees and hip joints at the same level, less than comfortable for lounging. They also use the front rail to support the sitter’s legs at the knees and would be less comfortable with long chair legs – like the left example – where the sitter’s legs get less of a boost from the ground. The right chair – with its shorter legs – would be a bit better.

      The seat ‘sling’ for a “Schwartz style” is set up a bit differently than the two above and is much more comfortable. The main seat sling is supported on the lower front and rear rails like the right example but also has a second narrow sling that runs between the upper side rails under the seat sling. This gets pushed forward towards the sitter’s knees and gets adjusted to lift their legs off the front rail and their knees above their hips. This sitting position is much like that of a Morris chair. Chris’s assembly video shows the second sling being added at 0:18 and the Morris chair form starting about 1:45.

      A test chair could be made using cheap lumber for the legs and back pieces and canvas or Sunbrella for support, allowing the builder to adjust dimensions to suit. The seat rails should be split (or sawn) for straight grain and shaped from strong wood; proper-sized dowels from the BORG usually have massive grain run-out leading to high hilarity amongst onlookers during test sittings…


Comments are closed.