Charles H. Hayward on Utility Furniture


A bed built under the post-war Utility Furniture scheme in England. On display at the Cheltenham museum.

Perhaps one of the most testing times of furniture-making was that of war time and the immediately following years, when utility furniture came into being. Certain restrictions had to be placed on the methods of construction and the weight of timber used. It was realised that the items had to be reasonably durable, but the stringent requirements of the times made it necessary to keep timber sizes to the minimum. At the same time, although all unnecessary weight was avoided, there was a limit below which furniture would be unsound.

Compared with furniture of the Victorian and earlier periods, utility furniture was lightly built, but most people today have come to realise that much early furniture was unnecessarily heavy, and that in some ways lightness is a virtue providing that strength is adequate.
A problem that confronts the man in the home workshop is that of the thickness and width he should make the various parts. To the furniture designer or craftsman the decision is largely one of appearance only, because over the years a tradition has grown up in which the sections are more or less settled within certain limits.

If this sounds like blindly doing a thing for no better reason than repeating what was done before, it should be remembered that trade practice is generally founded on what experience has shown to be sound. Sometimes you can get away with slighter material, but it is often because you have to, either because the cost is too great otherwise, or because larger stuff is not available.

In any case we have to realise that, except for first-quality things, furniture today is not built for posterity as it used to be. The day when furniture was intended to be handed down to later generations has largely gone. Ask any young couple of today whether they want to start their home with things from the home of their parents, and you will invariably be told that such old-fashioned stuff does not interest them. Perhaps they are right. If the true craftsman dislikes the idea of making a thing that is not intended to last, at least the younger generation is entitled to its view of what it wants.

— Charles Hayward, from The Woodworker, February 1961

About Lost Art Press

Publisher of woodworking books and videos specializing in hand tool techniques.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Charles H. Hayward on Utility Furniture

  1. kendewitt608 says:

    SO this is how IKEA got started !

  2. abtuser says:

    This book will be interesting. I have a lot of inherited furniture made by my German immigrant carpenter/furniture making relatives coming my way in the (hopefully distant) future. Some made in the U.S. once they got here. But other pieces made in Germany in the style of the region they came from. Interesting read, and unlike those ‘youngsters’ Hayward is writing about, I’m looking forward to inheriting it.

  3. Dave Preece says:

    I had a “utility” sofa and two arm chairs that had belonged to my Grandmother (and then my parents), that were given to me when I built my first house in the late 1980’s. I gave them to charity when I replaced them with other (lighter and smaller, but still “hand me down”) furniture in the late 1990’s (which I still have). The “utility” furniture was heavy and solid when compared to much of today’s furniture, particularly with the steel fold out bed in the sofa. This furniture was all clearly marked with a “utility” stamp to show compliance with the restrictions of the time.

Comments are closed.