With industry there is no coping. More and more it is establishing its own claims, which we are forced to recognize.
But men who have fighting souls will keep intact their freedom to do and be, and there is no better way than the craftsman’s for safeguarding those things.
Editor’s note: The world of modern woodworking publishing is only a pale imitation of what occurred in England during most of the 20th century. And the primary source of the best woodworking writing of the 1900s was The Woodworker magazine, a publication that has been in continuous operation since the beginning of the last century.
For the last year, I have been actively collecting and consuming a lot of this amazing writing, and it has profoundly influenced the way I gather and disseminate information in my day job at Popular Woodworking Magazine.
One of the biggest discoveries of my research was that two of my biggest heroes – Charles H. Hayward and Robert Wearing – were acquainted. Hayward was the editor and one-man publishing phenomenon that was The Woodworker. And Wearing was one of his correspondents.
Wearing is the author of many landmark books on the craft, including “The Essential Woodworker,” which we have republished. “The Essential Woodworker” is, without a doubt, one of the best examples of workshop writing in the 20th century. It represents what I aspire to as a woodworking journalist. And it humbles me whenever I pick it up.
Inside Wearing’s volume is a concentrated course in how to become a high-quality hand-tool woodworker. Start at the beginning of the book and read it through, and it will change your life. It sure as hell changed mine.
Mr. Wearing was kind enough to sit down and write out his recollections of working with Mr. Hayward. It is with great pride that I present it here.
— Christopher Schwarz
In 1950 after completing a course as a craftsman teacher at Loughborough College, now University (where I was lucky to have been taught by Edward Barnsley, the most outstanding English designer craftsman of the last century), I was invited to teach in a Public School. These schools are a peculiarly English phenomenon, being fee-paying independent boarding schools, then not co-educational. I was to organise the workshops and plan a currriculum for the General Certificate in Education at Ordinary and Advanced level in what was then called Handicraft (wood and metal).
In the early 1950s my other son was given a toy woodworker’s tool set. This was obviously made in Germany as the little plane was modeled on the traditional wooden smoother. But what intrigued me was that the plane was built up, i.e. glued together. I had never seen or read of built-up planes. A number of my fellow students were very keen on the wooden jack plane. I was not, but this discovery tempted me to make a built-up wooden jack plane, using the modern glue developed during the war for the aircraft industry.
I made a lever cap similar to the Stanley and Record planes with the difference that instead of the lever I used a screw. This was from brass and once polished it looked very smart. I drew and photographed this and sent it off to The Woodworker. it was accepted and was my first step into writing.
Years later when at an annual Woodworker show in London I went to the organisers’ stand and there met Charles Hayward. I introduced myself and he immediately remembered the wooden jack plane and its built-up construction. That was the first of many meetings with Hayward. How he got into publishing, I never knew.
He must have served an apprenticeship before the 1914-18 war because he told me he had served in the Royal Artillery, my own regiment, as a driver and that being the smallest man in the battery, he was always given the largest horses to ride. The horses in the gun teams were were ridden, not driven like a stage coach, so he had two big horses to manage.
After the war I think he went to The Woodworker as an assistant to the editor. it would have been hard to find a better man, so vast was his knowledge of woodwork. I heard he had edited a magazine of the “hobbies” type, long extinct and moved from there to The Woodworker.
He was still there when war broke out again in 1939. This time England managed without him but on the declaration of war the editor of The Woodworker fled to a remote part of Scotland, never to be heard of again. Thus Hayward became editor of The Woodworker, which in spite of paper shortages, never missed an issue.
Post-war, Hayward had several assistant editors but the input was predominantly his. He was an amazing editor. The ideas for the projects were his. The pieces were most probably made in his own workshop. In the Evans Brothers building he had a photographic studio with a workbench which he used when photographing constructional details. The finished projects were photographed using a small 2” x 2″ plate camera. In a small darkroom he developed the plates and made the enlargements from the plates.
The drawings, both technical and illustrative, were his work. He then wrote the text. So he was virtually a one-man publisher.
Between running the magazine almost single-handed he found time to write a number of fine textbooks, aimed, I think, at the advanced amateur. Foremost in my mind are “Cabinet Making for Beginners,” “Light Machines for Woodwork,” “Woodwork Joints” and “English Period Furniture.”
Although at Loughborough Hayward’s books were never on the book list, and his name was never mentioned, I noticed several bright ideas given us by the lecturers had been lifted complete from his publications!
Hayward was a great encourager to young and first-time writers. He answered personally scores of Readers Questions as if nothing was too much trouble. His letters were old fashioned, courtly and formal. I regret I have not saved any. It was always “Dear Mr. Wearing,” with an equally formal ending. He never used rejection slips but always with returned work, sent a polite letter, often with a criticism and perhaps a suggestions for improvement.
After his retirement, there was a string of editors. I remember Zachary Taylor particularly, who later made a name for himself making replicas of ancient musical instruments. He was also a fine classical guitarist.
My last editor was Paul Richardson, a good craftsman who left to found Furniture and Cabinet Making for GMC publications. I moved over with him. Most of my work from then on went to GMC. Sadly he was killed riding his motorcycle.
I have fond memories of Charles Hayward. He had the gift of making you feel you mattered.
My relationship with him was purely business, so I know nothing of his private life or views. He was well acquainted with the work of the Arts and Crafts men of the Cotswold school as with period furniture.
I doubt if we will see his like again.
— Bob WearingWe have just received our second press run of the book “The Essential Woodworker,” which is printed in the United States on acid-free paper and is hardbound. We offer it for $23 plus shipping, which is a remarkable price considering that vintage copies of this book will sell for $100 at times. You can read more about this book here.
If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up people together to collect wood and don’t assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea.
— Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, (1900-1944) French writer, aviator, (The quote is attributed to Saint-Exupéry; however it appears in only one distinct American translation of “Citadelle.”)
I had to build a new coffee table. The was mainly a hand tool project. The only machines I used were a table saw, jointer, thickness planer and a hand held electric planer to get most of the material off the underside taper of the top. In doing this project I realized that woodworking is a simple endeavor. You mark a line and saw, chisel or plane to the line.
All the mistakes I make are related to marking the line in the wrong place or sawing, chiseling or planing beyond the line. So In order to improve my woodworking techniques I did something radical. I took my copy of The Essential Woodworker, into the shop and left it there. Now, before I begin a task that I have not done in a while, I break open the book and see what the author Robert Wearing (RW) has to say. For example, I was cutting tenons for a new coffee table and wanted to share what I learned.
I sawed out the tenons then corrected any unevenness with a router plane. I made one of the tenons 7/16 inches thick. It was an easy three step process to get to this dimension. First I marked the tenons with a cutting gauge to a fat 1/2 inch. Then sawed them out trying to split the line. Then I incorrectly set the router plane to the wrong depth taking too much off causing the tenons to be a thin 1/2 inch. Then I just set the router gage to the correct depth to get to 7/16. Done! I corrected this faux pax on the other tenons which came out to an accurate 1/2 inch. Ok so I wondered what RW said about this?
According to page 68 RW states that “The accurate sawing of tenons is a vital skill”…and “the tenons should fit from the saw”. Fortunately, on page 72, he shows us how to use a router plane to correct a thick tenon. I looked but there is nothing about fixing a thin tenon so I assume my technique of changing the tenon thickness is the best approach. He also includes pictures of what the tenons should look like as they are sawn out. In looking at the pictures I did notice that I had been incorrectly starting my saw at the near corner of the tenon instead of the far corner which Mr. Wearing points out. In thinking about this I agree because starting at the far corner puts the saw on the line in the place that is most difficult to see. It is easier to saw toward your body then to saw away from your body. I will remember this next time and report back on my luck.
That said the router plane technique works perfect. It also has the benefit of ensuring that the tenon is exactly in the middle of the stuff. I have made tenons that were not in the middle of my stuff causing the stock to be proud on one side requiring more planing work. Again these problems are related to making a mistake in marking a line or getting to it.
Another marking mistake came when I cut the mortis on two of the legs to the line that marked the beginning of the taper not the end of the mortis. The mortis was 3/4 inch too long causing an unsightly gap. This became a inspiration for adding some flare. I glued a spacer on the end of the tenon (shown in the pic) and when it was inserted into the mortis it caused the tenon to be supported and left a small gap which I filled with some ebony that Chris had given me years ago.
The last design flare was the result of a large chip of wood coming out of the apron board as it went through the thickness planer. Fortunately the chip was pretty much in the middle of the board and I decided to use it as the middle of the letter “A”. I carved the letters L and P on either side for a really cool design. Fortunately all the mistakes were on the one side of the table so it looks like it was done by design. At least that is the story I am sticking to.
Don’t get me wrong, I like talking about workbench design. But I easily get five e-mails or phone messages a day about the topic, and sometimes I think I should open a 900-line for woodworkers with questions about bench design.
Here’s the TV commercial: Imagine me wearing only a shop apron (i.e. picture a monkey at the zoo with glasses and a shop apron). There’s some candlelight – tallow candles, natch. And a little Vaseline on the lens of the camera for that “soft” effect that hides the crows’ feet around my eyes.
Cue the wife-swapping music.
Then cue my husky, nasal voice, slightly slurred from the date-rape drug my boss slipped into my coffee to convince me to do this.
“How big is it? Press 1 to talk about how large it should be, and if you need a third leg.”
“Should you put wood in those holes? Press 2 to chat about wood dogs or brass ones. I have a pair of brass ones.”
“Who doesn’t want a twin-screw? Press 3 to talk about wood screws and 4 to see if you should upgrade to metal.”
“Do you have a curly crotch? Press 5 to talk about your wood options. Just 99 cents a minute. 1-900-Got Wood.”
OK, that’s is quite enough of that. Good thing our human resources people are out this week.